Spread the love


This was a hard image to get, as all of the new fritillaries were whirling around like … well, butterflies!

For weeks, my garden has been ALIVE with the beating of orange wings! I have Gulf Fritillaries coming at me from every corner of my garden – I think the other day I counted more than 20 – and more are emerging from cocoons every day!

chomp chomp chomp poop poop chomp oops there goes my exoskeleton chomp chomp poop

I am an ardent collector of passiflora species, and my Passifloras ‘Lavender Lady and edulis are completely chewed up right now, looking shabby and horrid. Why? Because THESE monsters have been chomping on the leaves and getting fat! And they are pooping up a storm. It is hard to imagine how much these babies poop, but I guess when you think about the fact that all they do is eat and molt, the volume of … that stuff … makes perfect sense. It is unseasonably warm (although we in Southern California know that climate change is real – I guess this is just the weather we have now!) so I wonder if that is what is causing this extreme butterfly phenomenon – I have never, in 15 years of growing these vines, seen this much action on them!

I think the Monarch has a great publicity team behind it. Everyone is so concerned about planting the right milkweed so the monarchs will be able to find their way to the traditional monarch fiesta zone in Mexico that they forget about the other beautiful butterflies. There are over 2000 species of butterflies to tempt! Why should all the love go only to the monarchs? I mean I love a monarch, sure, but what about Admirals and Emperors? Snouts and Ladies? Yes, plant milkweed – but plant other things as well! I plant fennel specifically for the Anise Swallowtail – there are native plants that host the larvae, but I can’t harvest fennel seeds from a Tauschia! And I think life without passionflowers, exotic beasts that they are, would be a sad thing, not only because I would miss the incredible floral sculptures that are their blossoms, but also – the dance of the fritillaries is a magical thing to witness.

Once, I was lucky enough to be caught in a “butterfly storm” in the deciduous jungle of the Yucatan, near Merida. I don’t know if I will have a memory that will surpass it – the wonder, the the breathless thrill, the feeling that your heartbeat was being echoed by the tiny wings swirling, diving, and flitting around you … I wish I had the words to impart the glory of that moment. The butterflies were in their element, doing what butterflies do – and we can only witness it by tiptoeing into their worlds and then tiptoeing back out again, stepping very lightly. Let us hope that their native landscape will be preserved, so that we won’t have to argue about what to plant and what they eat and when to plant what they eat. If habitat is preserved, those issues will vanish.

the chrysalis – or pupa- hanging on for dear life from a thread attached to the hook that holds the hinge to my back gate. THAT is determination. And strand silk – they should build bridges from that stuff!

I am NOT anti-native nor am I against feeding wildlife with the native offerings we have, but I find the strong party line is “Natives Only” – and those of us who have been in the trenches for years, gardening organically, planting to attract beneficials and pollinators, know that nature is not that black and white. Life will out. Life adapts. Nature is flexible. The instar of  a butterfly will eat other than a native food source. If that wasn’t the case, evolution wouldn’t really work, as flexibility and adaptability are key for the “survival of the fittest”.  And survival, adaptability, and evolution is what the insect world is particularly good at.

Regular readers of mine know that I am ambivalent about the turning back the clock and trying to re-create native habitats in urban landscapes. So much pressure on the gardener to fix something that they did not break. Climate change has not been caused by people planting the wrong milkweed, or passionflowers attracting a butterfly whose native range has long expanded. Eradication of native landscapes isn’t the fault of the ornamental gardener (GASP!), so I hope we can all take a breath and enjoy the butterflies, no matter what leaf carried them in.

Posted by

Ivette Soler
on September 30, 2015 at 1:13 am, in the category CRRRITIC, Gardening on the Planet, Real Gardens.

Load More By skr
Load More In Crrritic


  1. Ivette Soler

    30th October 2016 at 10:45 pm

    I totally agree with you, Susan – let’s all think first. So many times I feel the pressure to fall in line with an orthodoxy that may not be the answer to everything. I think we need to question whatever claims to be “The Answer To Everything”. Usually that answer is propaganda of some sort. One of the things I love about the garden world and gardening itself is that it can exist outside of the world of the hard and fast rules because gardening is subtle and different for everyone, everywhere they garden. Gardening can function outside of the marketplace, outside of orthodoxy and dogma – it can be a thing that a person discovers for themselves. We can cultivate our own relationships with nature, we can collaborate with nature on our terms. I think it is a sacred relationship, a spirituality, and I tend to look upon those who want to impose boundaries on that personal space with suspicion. I’m all for taking a breath and thinking, and moving forward from your instincts and your personal relationship with your garden. I’m so glad you enjoyed the post!

  2. Ivette Soler

    20th November 2016 at 1:02 am

    It’s pretty awe-inspiring, isn’t it Laura? Seeing such a transformation right in front of you? And I think it is an apt metaphor for what we see in our seasonal process as gardeners. Sigh – butterflies! Just amazing!

  3. kermit

    28th November 2016 at 1:00 pm

    As for sharing the blame for climate change, I beg to differ. We are all behaving in ways which contribute to it, but we are what blogger RobertScribbler calls “captive consumers”. We can’t escape contributing because our civilization is set up to produce the appearance of wealth, but it’s based on production which borrow from the future. I hadn’t even heard of global warming until I was 50, at the turn of the century, while reading science blogs on the web. I certainly didn’t hear it from TV news or the local newspaper (remember those?).

  4. Ivette Soler

    28th November 2016 at 1:40 pm

    You and I think very similarly Kermit! I am part of a culture that is set up to consume. I consume, hopefully with a thought to ethics and the impact I have on the planet. But my organic gardening habits are not contributing to climate change. My mixed native, drought tolerant garden isn’t breaking our ecosystem. I refuse to be told that I can’t plant something I know works because of an agenda that I find bordering on horticultural xenophobia. Natives, YES – but natives ONLY? I have to say no.

  5. Ivette Soler

    28th November 2016 at 9:39 pm

    Marcia – sorry, but I am not entirely won over by Tallamy. I have read just as many studies that refute his findings, although I tend to lean towards supporting a robust native community. Tallamy’s work can inspire many to do great things, but it also inspires people to unplant areas that are thriving ecosystems, albeit non-native ones, in favor of a native ideal that is tied to a point in the past that is long gone. I, too, plant natives – but I plant well adapted exotics as well, happily so. It is just like the air conditioner that you use. You use it. And all the natives you plant will not make up for the fact that you use your ac and drive a car. Just the fact that we are planting with thought and purpose, and grappling with these issues, is a huge leap – I will not ask the gardening population to take on the onus of saving the world through planting only natives. It is a publicity stunt. Natives are a buzzword, a way to sell plants – and it works. It is fashion – and it isn’t bad! But we should recognize it for what it is. I do think that we are making significant progress in understanding our place in the environmental scheme of things, and all of the things we choose to do to make this world better should be applauded. But we should also know that sometimes, we are being caught up in a marketing campaign. Again – I am not saying that natives are bad – I am saying that eschewing all other plants that are non-invasive and well-adapted to your region in favor of natives only is not the way I myself choose to plant, because I believe that nature if far more flexible and adaptive than we are being led to believe. Btw – just because a thing is “in fashion” or “the flavor of the moment” doesn’t mean it is bad. Think of the culinary fad with kale! Kale is delicious and good for you, but you can’t eat only kale. Lots of other foods are nutritious, even though kale is being touted as THE superfood. But I applaud your gardening – I am always on the side of the gardener, as long as they aren’t planting invasives or using pesticides, herbicides, and synthetics! (haha I guess that was ALOT of caveats there!) Thank you for your comment! Good one!

  6. kermit

    29th November 2016 at 5:29 pm

    “But clearly, the data indicates that native plants create a more biodiverse ecosystem.”

  7. Ivette Soler

    30th November 2016 at 6:42 am

    Personally, I think more biodiversity creates more biodiversity. Natives can be invasive as well – it isn’t just exotic aliens that behave like thugs. Well adapted plants are good things, and a badly behaving native is not welcome in my gardens. I’m totally with you on a happily mixed-up garden!

  8. Ivette Soler

    30th November 2016 at 10:12 am

    Thanks for considering Conciliation Marcia! Just thinking about how we work forward from where we are, rather than trying to turn back time and climate, is where I stand. And realizing that we, as people on this planet, are a part of nature as well (although the havoc we wreak seems to deny this). Nature is destructive and catastrophic, and wipes out species all on her own, before we were introduced as the dominant species on this planet. That isn’t to say that we shouldn’t strive to make the best choices for our planet – whenever I bring up this point someone inevitably says “oh well should we all just throw up our hands and just do whatever!” No, not if we feel a moral and ethical responsibility to our planet. But we are also enlivened by endeavors that fall outside of the wild and native – I, for one, am delighted by gardens that are blatantly artificial and formal. It is a unique expression. I would never do that in my home, but I love the art and impulse of it. To limit the gardener’s expression of passion to a purely native palette would be sad to me. But a native palette is crucial to our moving forward and understanding our stewardship of the planet’s landscape. I hope this makes sense! The marketing of natives seems fairly obvious to me – natives are all the rage. Nurseries are doing a very brisk business in natives and people are reading articles about natives in their Sunday papers. It has an effect. It isn’t a bad thing – the trend could be hybrid tea roses – yikes!!!

  9. Jodie Cook

    30th November 2016 at 1:01 pm

    Such an interesting discussion! Working much of the time in gardens myself, it has become obvious to me that we are approaching our urban gardens and landscapes as jujitsu matches where we must wrestle, literally to the death, flora, fauna and soil in order to have the look we envision.
    I heartily disagree with the notion that widespread interest in natives is trendy, a fad or marketing and sales driven. I simply don’t see this as the underlying motive of the many people I know who are either professional native plant growers or purist native designers. They don’t see natives as the ticket to riches. That is almost laughable. They feel a rare and pure integrity inherent in what they are doing that doesn’t exist in many other endeavors.
    Most can appreciate a ‘designed’ landscape that is more art than garden, although they likely won’t think that we should carpet our cities and suburbs with environmentally sterile land art.
    I see the trend toward natives, either as some percentage of a planting scheme or as a complete palette, as a natural and necessary course correction because in so many instances we are way off track in our need to control nature without any deep understanding of it as a connected living system.
    I can drive for quite a few miles in my master-planned and intensively managed county and see not a single plant that co-evolved with anything living here. I see lots of mismanaged, compacted, dead soil and sprinklers desperately applying California’s drinking water to tropical shrubs.
    I don’t think it’s marketing to decide that maybe we should stop wrestling and bring back some of the beautiful, garden-worthy natives that were here for millennia before us.
    Truth is, many can’t survive in these intensively managed places we have created, anyway, so in some sense it could be argued that we might as well wrestle with what can survive because it has been bred to.
    We should try to ‘fix’ what we have broken, of course. All change comes from the bottom up. I don’t think anyone would say that it’s ok to eliminate all urban wild animals in favor of domestic pets simply because we have built dog parks – so why is it ok to eliminate wild plants in favor of lab-bred, sterile cultivars simply because we have built landscapes that support them? This is what we have done.
    Seems to me that if you approach the garden as a living system, then you can adorn it as you wish with all the frilly plant jewelry you like, but the basic underlying structure still has to work as a complete living system that at least has a chance to survive on its own if its caretaker vacates for a period of time.

  10. Ivette Soler

    30th November 2016 at 6:38 pm

    That is a good analogy – to do what we do in a measured way, rather than going all PETA on a thing. Finding a middle path is fairly radical for someone who may have been mowing lawn and planting thirsty invasive exotics all their lives!

  11. Ivette Soler

    1st December 2016 at 1:24 am

    Hi Jodie! Thanks for your thoughtful comment!
    I don’t disagree with you on most of your points, but I simply don’t see this as an either/or proposition, and that id how many native plants activists see it. I say over and over that I use natives heavily, and think that a native backbone to our landscapes is smart and ethical, but somehow that always escapes people who are very eager to argue with me because I am not a native-only purist. oh, well – I can’t make anyone think any differently than they do if they aren’t willing to entertain that there may be another way to create a landscape that is healthy, balanced, and good for our ecological system other than ripping out everything that is not native and replacing those plants with natives. In that way, yes – it is a dogma that impacts the sales of plants, and the work of designers, at a time whom the nursery industry was at a loss – people seemed to have forgotten gardening for a while and the industry was in a predictable slump after the housing crash. The interest in edibles, drought tolerance, and natives resuscitated many local nurseries and growers – and the smart ones moved to where the interest is. That is – sorry – pretty much the definition of a trend. Again – like I said above – THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS BAD. And I have no doubt that those who are passionately proselytizing about natives only in our landscapes believe what they are saying is truth. I, however, tend to think that there is no one way. We need to be diverse, flexible, and adaptable – and personally, I don’t think looking backwards to some pristine “native time” is the entirety of the answer. It is horticultural xenophobia. I believe we move forward with all the healthy, sound, pragmatic tools we have – and native plants are a part of that but certainly not the entirety of it. It is really funny to me that this is so threatening to some people – they come at me with the same kind of ire as if I were saying natives are bad and never to use them. Nowhere did I say I wanted “sterile land art” to blanket the nation, nor am I advocating watering tropical shrubs in Southern California – you are throwing out straw men here. I am simply saying that we have more in our arsenal that just a native palette. Many of the best drought tolerant plants for my climate are not native to here – but I am certainly going to use them – it would be silly to be such a purist that I would cut off my nose to spite my face. I am also going to use the many lovely native plants at my disposal and I will also grow food – much of it non-native. Some people may feel differently, and more power to them. I will never tell someone who loves there natives to stop planting them, duh! I want people who are passionate ornamental gardeners to know that there is another way – that we can still create the design schemes we love while planting with wisdom and the health of the planet in mind. I know what I say seems to be a threat – despite all the caveats I write to assure people that I ALSO USE AND LOVE NATIVES – but it seems that unless you are all in the native-only camp, those in that camp don’t want to hear it. Oh well! More power to you, because I have no doubt you are making your world a better place, and that is totally great. Thanks again, Jodi!

  12. kermit

    1st December 2016 at 10:49 am

    A fella once told me that when he was at parties and somebody asked his religion, he would reply “Zen Baptist”. Some folks heard only “Zen”, and some heard only “Baptist”. But, he said, those who heard both were the most interesting to talk to.

  13. admin

    1st December 2016 at 1:02 pm

    Speaking of how the native plant movement/war on invasives” got started, have you read this? http://harpers.org/archive/2015/09/weed-whackers/1/
    If there’s a profit motive, think big – Monsanto.

  14. Ivette Soler

    1st December 2016 at 8:42 pm

    Susan! That sounded great but I couldn’t read the full article!!! I have such empathy from just the first paragraph, but of course I don’t want to assume anything about the content of the article. I wish I could read it w/o subscribing – if only they had a system like the NYT has of access to 5 articles before the firewall comes up. But, yes – the ultimate profit in the game goes to the BIG EVIL. Ugh. In fact, thank goodness plant trends that really catch hold come along – those have saved our industry time and time again. It is really sad that the small, local plant growers and independent nurseries never end up seeing a teensy fraction of the profit that the Big Bad does. THAT is a trend I would love to see – more independent nurseries and local growers, and organic companies that aren’t eventually bought by Bayer or Monsanto. I will try to hunt out a copy of the article so I can speak to it in a more informed way – thanks for posting so I can start the hunt! XO

  15. admin

    1st December 2016 at 9:16 pm

    Harper’s allows one free article per month, so try again, or from another computer. The article’s a shocker.

Leave a Reply

Check Also

Sustainable Cow Pots for Better Garden Plants

Spread the love The best kind of sustainability is to take a waste product and turn it int…